SERVER_OS: Linux ojs 3.10.0-1127.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 31 23:36:51 UTC 2020 x86_64
SERVER_SOFTWARE: nginx/1.16.1
PHP_VERSION: 7.3.33
DISABLE_FUNCTION: exec, passthru, shell_exec, system, proc_open, popen, curl_exec, curl_multi_exec, parse_ini_file, show_source

PATH:
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION, STAKEHOLDER TRUST AND GREEN INNOVATION: A CONCEPTUAL REVIEW OF SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS PERFORMANCE | International Journal of Advances in Business and Management Research (IJABMR)
Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
Published: 2026-09-12

DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION, STAKEHOLDER TRUST AND GREEN INNOVATION: A CONCEPTUAL REVIEW OF SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS PERFORMANCE

Alva’s College, Moodbidri, 574227 Karnataka, India
Alva’s College, Moodbidri, 574227 Karnataka, India
Mangalore University, Mangaluru 574199 Karnataka, India
Alva’s College, Moodbidri, 574227 Karnataka, India
Digital-Green Capability Digital Transformation Green Innovation Stakeholder Trust Sustainable Business Performance

Abstract

Digital transformation has become a key strategic tool for companies to make sustainability an integral part of everyday business. However, previous studies have largely examined digital capability, stakeholder trust, green innovation and sustainable performance in separate streams and have not explained how these constructs interact within one integrated framework. This review paper explores the interplay of digital transformation, stakeholder trust and green innovation/digital-green capability in shaping sustainable business performance. A structured narrative review inspired by thematic synthesis was conducted using EBSCOhost, ScienceDirect, Emerald Insight, SpringerLink, SAGE Journals and Wiley Online Library. The review protocol covered database searching and study selection, thematic coding and conceptual synthesis, resulting in 22 peer-reviewed studies, mostly published between 2019 and 2026. The paper reveals five core themes: digital transformation and sustainability alignment; stakeholder trust as relational capital; green innovation as a sustainability mechanism; digital-green capability as a composite organisational resource; and sustainable business performance as a multi-dimensional outcome. The originality of this review lies in integrating these previously fragmented streams within one capability-relational framework. Stakeholder trust is proposed as the moderating construct and digital-green capability as the central integration construct through which digital investment creates sustainability value. The framework also recognises green innovation as the enabler by which digital-green capability is translated into sustainable business performance. Four theoretical propositions are presented for further empirical research. The review advances scholarship beyond operational efficiency towards relational and environmental value creation. It also provides practical guidance for managers, sustainability officers, entrepreneurs and policymakers seeking to make credible and measurable sustainability commitments alongside digital investment.

References

  1. Khin S, Ho TCF. Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: a mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science. 2019;11(2):177-195. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2018-0083
  2. Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management. 1991;17(1):99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  3. Sheethal K. Exploring the synergies between digital transformation, environmental proactivity, and green innovation for sustainable business practices. Asian Journal of Managerial Science. 2024;13(2):31-37. https://doi.org/10.70112/ajms-2024.13.2.4248
  4. Teece DJ. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal. 2007;28(13):1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  5. Raghavendra R, Mg E. Integrating advanced technologies in retail: a conceptual framework for enhancing consumer experience and trust. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research. 2024;11(10). https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v11.i10.2024.1506
  6. Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review. 1995;20(3):709-734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
  7. Chen YS, Lai SB, Wen CT. The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics. 2006;67(4):331-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5
  8. Zhang Y, Sun J, Yang Z, Wang Y. Critical success factors of green innovation: technology, organization and environment readiness. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;264:121701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121701
  9. Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K. Examining the effects of green supply chain management practices and their mediations on performance improvements. International Journal of Production Research. 2012;50(5):1377-1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.571937
  10. Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management. 2003;14(3):207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
  11. Raghavendra R, Kumar R. Beyond rating accuracy: organisational justice and the social context of performance appraisal in banking. Interdisciplinary International Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities. 2026;2(2):104-116. https://doi.org/10.62674/iijassah.2026.v2i2.008
  12. Diddimani M. Determinants of green consumer behavior: psychological, social, economic, and contextual factors. Asian Review of Social Sciences. 2025;14(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.70112/arss-2025.14.1.4286
  13. Aparna K. Factors influencing Unified Payments Interface adoption among hawkers in Mangaluru: an extended Technology Acceptance Model approach. Asian Journal of Managerial Science. 2024;13(2):45-51. https://doi.org/10.70112/ajms-2024.13.2.4250
  14. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 2003;27(3):425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  15. Suvarni S, Deeksha D. Adoption of climate-smart agriculture technologies by agripreneurs: an integrated DOI and TAM approach. International Journal of Advances in Business and Management Research. 2025;3(1):46-66. https://doi.org/10.62674/ijabmr.2025.v3i01.005
  16. Naik K, Prabhu V. Investment intentions among early-career professionals in Dakshina Kannada District in India: a behavioral perspective. International Journal of Advances in Business and Management Research. 2025;2(4):19-29. https://doi.org/10.62674/ijabmr.2025.v2i04.003
  17. Elkington J. Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing; 1997. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006129603978
  18. Sheethal K. A study on consumer satisfaction and repurchase intention in e-commerce in Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka, India. Asian Journal of Managerial Science. 2025;14(2):10-18. https://doi.org/10.70112/ajms-2025.14.2.4281

How to Cite

K. G., A., N. H., S. B., H. R, M., & Naik, K. (2026). DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION, STAKEHOLDER TRUST AND GREEN INNOVATION: A CONCEPTUAL REVIEW OF SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS PERFORMANCE. International Journal of Advances in Business and Management Research (IJABMR), 4(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.62674/ijabmr.2026.v4i01.005

Metrics

Article Contents

Indexed In

 

Journal title

International Journal of Advances in Business and Management Research (IJABMR)

ISSN (online)

2584-1718

Publisher's name

Swami Vivekananda Global Academy, India

Established Since

2023

Email Id

info@ijabmresearch.org

DOI Prefix

10.62674/ijabmr

Peer Review

Double Anonymous Peer Review

Licensing

CC BY-NC-ND

Open Access

Yes

 

Indexed In








Score: 6.038









Tools

Flag Counter