SERVER_OS: Linux ojs 3.10.0-1127.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 31 23:36:51 UTC 2020 x86_64
SERVER_SOFTWARE: nginx/1.16.1
PHP_VERSION: 7.3.33
DISABLE_FUNCTION: exec, passthru, shell_exec, system, proc_open, popen, curl_exec, curl_multi_exec, parse_ini_file, show_source
PATH:
BREAKING THE ENTREPRENEURIAL GROWTH BARRIER: STARTUP STRATEGIES THAT SCALE SMARTER | International Journal of Advances in Business and Management Research (IJABMR)
Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
IJABMR
Articles
DOI: 10.62674/ijabmr.2025.v3isupp2.002
Published: 2025-11-11

BREAKING THE ENTREPRENEURIAL GROWTH BARRIER: STARTUP STRATEGIES THAT SCALE SMARTER

Osmania University, Hyderabad, 500007 Telangana, India
Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, 686560 Kerala, India
Business Scalability Entrepreneurial Growth Smart Scaling Strategies Startup Ecosystems Strategic Orientation

Abstract

This paper examines the complex and ambivalent challenges and opportunities associated with the scale of entrepreneurial ventures, providing a strategic framework around the theme of breaking the entrepreneurial growth barrier: startup strategies that scale smarter. The goal is to critically review the theoretical foundations of startups' scale-ups in ecosystems, as well as to present strategic levers for accelerating responsible and sustainable growth. Utilizing cross-disciplinary theoretical frames in strategic management, innovation, and entrepreneurial leadership, this paper is designed as a narrative-based analytical treatment to converge insights from established models and emergent thought leadership. The main contribution of this research is a categorization of "smart scaling strategies," including agility-focused models, resource leveraging means, ecosystem takeover, and adaptable market position. These tactics are introduced as an extendable and context-responsive approach, which is particularly useful for early-stage founders, incubators, and policymakers. This paper offers value by synthesizing this literature to propose an organizing lens that connects entrepreneurial ambition to operational scalability—a heuristic guide as opposed to a prescriptive manual. As a non-empirical paper, the generalizations and empirical evidence of this paper are restricted, but it gains high-level conceptual clarity and practical predictability. Among its implications, this study is relevant for entrepreneurs attempting to move from survival to scale, ecosystem enablers adopting growth-supportive policies, and educators developing entrepreneurs’ mindsets. What is new is to reposition “scaling” not only as a growth target but as a strategic posture based on systemic alignment, resource wisdom, and timing accuracy. In the end, this paper contends that to scale smarter, ambition is not enough: it requires strategic consistency, contextual intelligence, and ongoing learning.

References

  1. Blank S. Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard business review. 2013 May 1;91(5):63-72.
  2. Ismail S, Malone MS, Van Geest Y. Exponential Organizations: Why new organizations are ten times better, faster, and cheaper than yours (and what to do about it). diversion books; 2024 Dec 20.
  3. Marmer M, Herrmann BL, Dogrultan E, Berman R, Eesley C, Blank S. Startup genome report extra: Premature scaling. Startup genome. 2011 Mar;10:1-56.
  4. Eisenmann T. Managing Startups: Best Blog Posts. " O'Reilly Media, Inc."; 2013.
  5. Autio E, Nambisan S, Thomas LD, Wright M. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic entrepreneurship journal. 2018 Mar;12(1):72-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266
  6. Wasserman N. The founder's dilemmas: Anticipating and avoiding the pitfalls that can sink a startup.
  7. Barney, J., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), pp.99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  8. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A., 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), pp.509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z
  9. Sarasvathy SD. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of management Review. 2001 Apr 1;26(2):243-63. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
  10. Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy. 2000 Feb 1;29(2):109-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  11. Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Camp SM, Sexton DL. Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic management journal. 2001 Jun;22(6‐7):479-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.196
  12. Greiner LE. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard business review. 1998 May 1;76(3):55-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_25
  13. Moogk, D.R., 2012. Minimum viable product and the importance of experimentation in technology startups. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/535
  14. Doz YL, Kosonen M. Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long range planning. 2010 Apr 1;43(2-3):370-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.006
  15. Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Gilbert BA. Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of management. 2011 Sep;37(5):1390-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385695
  16. Clarysse B, Wright M, Bruneel J, Mahajan A. Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research policy. 2014 Sep 1;43(7):1164-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.014
  17. Boughaleb SE, Benkhider N, Kherbachi S, Keddari N, Berbar WB, Abedou A. Startups’ scalability: a qualitative study of challenges, enablers, and strategic perspectives. South Florida Journal of Development. 2025 Jun 6;6(6):e5420. https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv6n6-017
  18. Ries E. The lean startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Currency; 2011 Sep 13.
  19. Evans DS, Schmalensee R. Matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms. Harvard Business Review Press; 2016 May 3.
  20. Winter SG, Szulanski G. Replication as strategy. Organization science. 2001 Dec;12(6):730-43. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.6.730.10084.
  21. Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V. Co‐creating unique value with customers. Strategy & leadership. 2004 Jun 1;32(3):4-9. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570410699249
  22. George G, Bock AJ. The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship theory and practice. 2011 Jan;35(1):83-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00424.x.
  23. Adner R. The wide lens: What successful innovators see that others miss. Penguin; 2013 Jun 25.
  24. Lee S, Kim JD. When do startups scale? Large‐scale evidence from job postings. Strategic Management Journal. 2024 Sep;45(9):1633-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3596
  25. Shan W. An empirical analysis of organizational strategies by entrepreneurial high‐technology firms. Strategic management journal. 1990 Feb;11(2):129-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110205
  26. Camuffo A, Gambardella A, Messinese D, Novelli E, Paolucci E, Spina C. A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision‐making: Large‐scale replication and extension. Strategic Management Journal. 2024 Jun;45(6):1209-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3580
  27. Belitski M, Stettler T, Wales W, Martin J. Speed and scaling: an investigation of accelerated firm growth. Journal of Management Studies. 2023 May;60(3):639-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12869
  28. Runach P, Garg S, Narwal KP. An empirical investigation on financing choice descendants of Indian start-ups. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets. 2024 Dec;31(4):867-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-023-09434-7
  29. Klarin A, Suseno Y. An integrative literature review of social entrepreneurship research: Mapping the literature and future research directions. Business & Society. 2023 Mar;62(3):565-611. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221101611
  30. Lee KH, Kim MG, Lee JH, Lee J, Cho I, Choi M, Han HW, Park M. Empowering healthcare through comprehensive informatics education: the status and future of biomedical and health informatics education. Healthcare Informatics Research. 2024 Apr 30;30(2):113-26. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2024.30.2.113
  31. Ferreira MP, Reis NR, Miranda R. Thirty years of entrepreneurship research published in top journals: analysis of citations, co-citations and themes. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research. 2015 Dec;5(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-015-0035-6
  32. Breaugh J, McBride K, Kleinaltenkamp M, Hammerschmid G. Beyond diffusion: a systematic literature review of innovation scaling. Sustainability. 2021 Dec 7;13(24):13528. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413528
  33. Monteiro GF. High-growth firms and scale-ups: A review and research agenda. RAUSP Management Journal. 2019 Feb 11;54(1):96-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-03-2018-0004
  34. Autio E, Rannikko H. Retaining winners: Can policy boost high-growth entrepreneurship?. Research policy. 2016 Feb 1;45(1):42-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.002
  35. Prashantham S, Birkinshaw J. Choose your friends carefully: Home-country ties and new venture internationalization. Management International Review. 2015 Apr;55(2):207-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-015-0244-9
  36. Nambisan S. Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice. 2017 Nov;41(6):1029-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254
  37. Shepherd DA, Patzelt H. Entrepreneurial cognition: Exploring the mindset of entrepreneurs. Springer Nature; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71782-1
  38. Eisenmann TR. Entrepreneurship: A working definition. Harvard Business Review. 2013 Jan 10;10(5):1-3.
  39. Brown R, Mason C. Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy. Technovation. 2014 Dec 1;34(12):773-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.013
  40. George G, McGahan AM, Prabhu J. Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of management studies. 2012 Jun;49(4):661-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01048.x
  41. Kazanjian RK, Drazin R. A stage-contingent model of design and growth for technology based new ventures. Journal of business venturing. 1990 May 1;5(3):137-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(90)90028-R
  42. Neck HM, Greene PG. Entrepreneurship education: known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of small business management. 2011 Jan 1;49(1):55-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00314.x
  43. Doty DH, Glick WH. Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of management review. 1994 Apr 1;19(2):230-51. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9410210748
  44. Autio E, Kenney M, Mustar P, Siegel D, Wright M. Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research policy. 2014 Sep 1;43(7):1097-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015
  45. Teece DJ. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal. 2007 Dec;28(13):1319-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  46. Welter F, Smallbone D. Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of small business management. 2011 Jan 1;49(1):107-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00317.x
  47. Maurya A. Running lean: iterate from plan A to a plan that works. " O'Reilly Media, Inc."; 2022 Feb 23.
  48. MacInnis DJ. A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing. 2011 Jul;75(4):136-54. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136
  49. Belitski M, Kalyuzhnova Y, Kamasak R, Laker B. Institutions, resource dependence and the dual nature of corruption in firm internationalisation. human relations. 2025 Jun 2:00187267251355390. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267251355390
  50. Camuffo D. Perception and Reality: How the Depths of the High Waters in Venice Apparently Change with the Reference System. Climate. 2024 May 1;12(5):62. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12050062
  51. Xuelei Z, Bhaumik A. Development of Strategic, Transformative Innovation Strategies and Network in Chinese Manufacturing Small and Medium Sized Enterprise. International Journal of Advances in Business and Management Research (IJABMR). 2024 Sep 12;2(1):17-25. https://doi.org/10.62674/ijabmr.2024.v2i01.003
  52. Yim SY, Lee SH, Baek SW, Sohn B, Jeong YS, Kang SH, Park K, Park H, Lee SS, Kaseb AO, Park YN. Genomic biomarkers to predict response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: Insights from the IMbrave150 trial. Clinical and molecular hepatology. 2024 Jul 23;30(4):807. https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2024.0333
  53. Pearson GD, Silver NA, Robinson JY, Azadi M, Schillo BA, Kreslake JM. Beyond the margin of error: a systematic and replicable audit of the TikTok research API. Information, Communication & Society. 2025 Feb 17;28(3):452-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2420032
  54. Zahra SA, Wright M, Abdelgawad SG. Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International small business journal. 2014 Aug;32(5):479-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613519807
  55. Yuhuan J, Hans E. High-Performance and Transportable Materials: Analyzing Characteristics and Applications in Sustainable Construction. International Journal of Advances in Business and Management Research (IJABMR). 2025 Mar 12;2(3):1-8. https://doi.org/10.62674/ijabmr.2025.v2i03.001

Metrics

Article Contents

Indexed In

 

Journal title

International Journal of Advances in Business and Management Research (IJABMR)

ISSN (online)

2584-1718

Publisher's name

Swami Vivekananda Global Academy, India

Established Since

2023

Email Id

info@ijabmresearch.org

DOI Prefix

10.62674/ijabmr

Peer Review

Double Anonymous Peer Review

Licensing

CC BY-NC-ND

Open Access

Yes

 

Indexed In








Score: 6.038









Tools