Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
Published: 2024-10-01

Ethno-Cultural Diversity: A Challenging Parameter for Asean Regional Integration

Lincoln University College, Malaysia
Ethno-Cultural Diversity ASEAN Integration Regional Cohesion Inclusive Governance Economic Cooperation

Abstract

The presence of diverse ethnic and cultural groups poses a challenging yet crucial obstacle to the process of integrating the ASEAN region. This review article examines the impact of the diverse range of races, languages, faiths, and cultural traditions in Southeast Asia on the political, economic, and social aspects of ASEAN's integration efforts. The primary objective of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is to foster regional tranquillity, stability, and economic collaboration. However, in order to accomplish these aims, ASEAN must effectively navigate the complex terrain of variety. The article commences by analysing the historical backdrop of ethno-cultural variety in the region, emphasizing the influence of colonial legacies and historical migrations on current demographic patterns. Subsequently, it examines the political ramifications of this variety, namely how ethnic and cultural disparities can both pose challenges and enhance the policy-making procedures within ASEAN. The review examines the impact of cultural diversity on trade, investment, and economic policies, highlighting how it can create hurdles as well as stimulate creativity and growth through varied perspectives. Economic integration is also a key focus of the discussion. The evaluation of social cohesiveness takes into account the impact of ethno-cultural variety on regional identity and solidarity. The article examines the several measures and structures that ASEAN has put in place to handle diversity, including cultural exchange programs and educational activities designed to promote mutual understanding and respect among member states. This essay offers a thorough examination of the relationship between ethno-cultural diversity and ASEAN integration, providing valuable insights into possible approaches to promoting unity amidst diversity.

Introduction

According to the framework of globalization and the advancement of regional organizations, regions are undergoing swift economic growth and heightened political collaboration in their shared effort to achieve sustainable development, peace, and stability. Additionally, they are working together to address challenges and improve international competitiveness. Nevertheless, cultural elements are frequently disregarded in this procedure. During the initial phases of regional coordination, member states collaborate to address shared challenges and promote economic growth, which serves as the foundation for their union. However, as regional integration progresses and political and economic integration reaches a more advanced level, cultural factors start to take prominence (Magnanet al., 2024). Cultural diversity within a region arises from variations in geography, historical circumstances, ethnicity, religion, and values. The presence of varied values and approaches to tasks presents a difficulty for member states from different regions to come to consensus on policies. In addition, the heightened interconnection within a specific area, including trade and migration, has resulted in the convergence of individuals from many cultural heritages. This amalgamation or conflict of cultures has influenced the progress of local economic growth, political strategies, and social structure (Ullah & Ming Yit Ho, 2020).

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), consisting of 10 member states, is a region known for its significant ethno-cultural variety. The wide range of races, languages, faiths, and cultural traditions within this variety is both a defining characteristic and a serious obstacle to regional integration (Munalim, 2019). The primary objective of regional integration in ASEAN is to promote economic collaboration, political stability, and social unity among its member nations. Nevertheless, the presence of diverse ethnic and cultural groups in the region poses distinct challenges that must be resolved in order to accomplish these objectives.

The Background Story of Ethno-Cultural Diversity in Southeast Asia

The Southeast Asian region possesses a diverse and intricate past that has played a significant role in shaping its present ethno-cultural makeup. Throughout history, the region has served as a cultural hub, blending various civilisations and being shaped by the influences of Indian, Chinese, Islamic, and Western colonial powers. These exchanges have led to the formation of a diverse blend of cultures, languages, and faiths (Ptak & Konrad, 2021). The influence of colonial control was essential in determining country borders and ethnic demographics, frequently intensifying ethnic rifts and establishing the foundation for present-day difficulties. For example, the British colonial strategy of implementing a policy of divide and conquer in Malaysia and Myanmar, as well as the Dutch colonisation of Indonesia, resulted in the formation of fragmented societies characterised by entrenched ethnic differences (Hammond, 2020). The dynamics have become more complex due to post-colonial nation-building efforts as newly independent states tried to establish national identities while also dealing with ethnic variety.

Political ramifications of ethno-cultural diversity

The presence of many ethnic and cultural groups has significant effects on political processes and governance among the member states of ASEAN. Ethnic and cultural disparities have frequently served as a catalyst for political strife and discord. Myanmar's challenges with ethnic insurgencies and Malaysia's policy of affirmative action based on ethnicity demonstrate how ethno-cultural diversity may impact national politics (Nygymetova, G., 2020). ASEAN must effectively manage these intricacies at the regional level in order to foster political stability and collaboration. The adherence to the concept of non-interference in the internal affairs of member states, which is a fundamental aspect of ASEAN's diplomatic strategy, frequently hinders attempts to resolve cross-border ethnic tensions and human rights concerns (Harjatanaya & Hoon, 2018). However, it also demonstrates a practical acknowledgement of the region's variety and the importance of honouring the authority of individual nations. ASEAN faces the task of creating systems that can handle this variety while also promoting unity within the region. This involves advocating for inclusive government approaches that acknowledge and honour the cultural characteristics of different ethnic groups within member nations. The ASEAN Charter and the ASEAN Community Vision 2025 prioritize inclusion and respect for variety as fundamental principles for establishing a stable and unified region.

Economic Integration and Ethno-Cultural Diversity

The primary goal of ASEAN is to achieve economic integration, which involves the establishment of a unified market and manufacturing base to improve the region's global competitiveness. Nevertheless, the presence of diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds can impact on the formulation of economic policies and the effectiveness of integration initiatives. Language disparities, variations in cultural practices, and disparities in economic growth among member states can create obstacles to commerce, investment, and the movement of workers. However, ethno-cultural variety can also serve as a valuable resource for achieving economic unification. The multitude of different viewpoints and customs within ASEAN have the potential to stimulate innovation and creativity, hence cultivating a vibrant economic atmosphere (Budirahayu & Saud, 2020). The ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) seeks to capitalize on these varied capabilities by fostering inclusive economic expansion and diminishing disparities in development among member nations.

Social Cohesion and Regional Identity

Establishing a collective regional identity is crucial for fostering social unity within ASEAN. Nevertheless, the endeavour faces considerable hurdles due to the region's ethnocultural variety. The national characteristics of ASEAN member states are frequently closely linked to racial and religious identities, which can occasionally clash with the concept of a more extensive regional identity (Moran, 2020). Facilitating mutual comprehension and admiration among the different ethnicities within ASEAN is vital for cultivating societal unity. ASEAN utilises intercultural interaction programs, academic endeavours, and discussions on cultural variety as measures to foster a collective regional identity (Ludewig, 2021). The ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC) framework prioritizes the significance of establishing strong connections between individuals and promoting cultural comprehension as the basis for a united and resilient community.

Role of Regional Institutions and Civil Society

ASEAN relies heavily on regional organisations and civil society to effectively manage ethnocultural diversity and foster integration. The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) and the ASEAN Institute for Peace and Reconciliation (AIPR) are dedicated to tackling human rights concerns and fostering peace and reconciliation in the region. Civil society organisations (CSOs) play a crucial role in campaigning for the civil liberties of ethnic and cultural minorities and promoting intercultural understanding. Civil society organisations (CSOs) assist in the development of inclusive communities by creating forums for disadvantaged voices and supporting grassroots efforts. This enables societies to effectively address the challenges posed by ethnocultural diversity (Budirahayu & Saud, 2020).

The presence of diverse ethnic and cultural groups is a basic aspect of Southeast Asia, which poses both obstacles and opportunities for the process of regional integration in ASEAN. Although the presence of diverse elements makes it challenging to establish political stability, economic cooperation, and social cohesion, it also enhances the cultural fabric of the region and can stimulate innovation and creativity (van Bakel & Vance, 2023). Efficiently managing ethnocultural variety by implementing inclusive government, fair economic policies, and strong social initiatives is crucial for achieving the objectives of ASEAN integration. Through the acceptance and promotion of its diverse elements and the cultivation of a collective regional identity, ASEAN can effectively negotiate the complexities of integration and construct a unified and resilient community (Purwani & Arvianti, 2020).

Objective of Study

· To analyze the impact of ethno-cultural diversity on political stability and governance in ASEAN member states:

· To examine the role of ethnocultural diversity in economic integration and development within ASEAN:

· To evaluate the effectiveness of ASEAN initiatives in promoting social cohesion and a shared regional identity amidst ethno-cultural diversity:

Literature Review

An overview of the ethno-cultural diversity in ASEAN

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is characterised by its ethnocultural diversity, encompassing ten member states: Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. Each of these nations is distinguished by a diverse array of ethnic communities, dialects, religions, and cultural customs (Juma, 2020). The presence of diverse cultures in the region, although it enhances the cultural environment, presents considerable obstacles to the efforts of regional integration. This research review examines the diverse effects of ethno-cultural diversity on ASEAN's political stability, economic integration, and social cohesion (Sulaimanet al.,2022).

Political Implications of Ethno-Cultural Diversity

The ethnocultural composition of ASEAN member states have a profound impact on their political landscape. The presence of diverse ethnic and cultural groups typically leads to intricate difficulties in governance, especially in handling ethnic conflicts and promoting inclusive political structures. Academics emphasise that ethnic disputes and grievances in countries such as Myanmar, Thailand, and Indonesia have substantial consequences for both national stability and regional security (Munalim, 2019). The policy of non-interference, a fundamental premise of ASEAN, frequently constrains the organisation's capacity to directly intervene in domestic ethnic conflicts. Existing evidence indicates that inclusive governance models play a vital role in effectively managing ethno-cultural diversity. Several authors have contended that confederation democracy and federalism offer effective frameworks for reconciling a variety of ethnic groups within a unified political unit. Nevertheless, the implementation of such models in the ASEAN context necessitates the delicate task of reconciling state sovereignty with the aspirations of regional integration. The ASEAN Charter and initiatives such as the ASEAN Political-Security Community (APSC) highlight the significance of political inclusivity and human rights. However, the actual execution of these principles is difficult due to the differences in political systems and levels of dedication across member states (Lin, 2020).

Economic Integration of Ethno-Cultural Diversity

ASEAN's regional cooperation initiatives are centred around economic integration, which seeks to establish a unified market and production foundation. Nevertheless, the presence of people from a variety of ethnic and cultural backgrounds has a significant impact on the formulation of economic policies and the facilitation of integration processes. Research conducted by researchers suggests that cultural disparities can have an impact on trade practices, business ethics, and regulatory frameworks, making it more challenging to align economic policies throughout the region. The presence of economic inequalities among different ethnic groups inside member states presents considerable difficulties (Verkuyten & Yogeeswaran, 2020). Malaysia's affirmative action policies, which prefer ethnic Malays, have resulted in economic tensions among other ethnic groups, affecting both social cohesiveness and economic policies. Similarly, in Indonesia, the economic inequalities between the Javanese majority and other ethnic groups have resulted in social instability and policy difficulties (Rohmahet al., 2023).

However, ethno-cultural variety can also serve as a valuable resource for promoting economic integration. The multitude of cultural viewpoints and customs can stimulate originality and inventiveness, cultivating a vibrant economic atmosphere. The primary objective of the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) is to capitalise on these advantages through the promotion of comprehensive economic expansion and the mitigation of disparities in development. The researchers assert that programs like the Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity 2025 and the Initiative for ASEAN Integration (IAI) aim to tackle these gaps and improve regional economic integration (Ho, 2020).

Social cohesion and regional identity

Establishing a unified regional identity is crucial for achieving ASEAN's objectives of long-term integration. Nevertheless, the diverse ethnocultural makeup of the region presents considerable obstacles to achieving social cohesion. ASEAN member states frequently exhibit a strong association between national identities and ethnic and cultural identities, which may clash with the concept of a more encompassing regional identity (Purwani & Arvianti, 2020). Cultural exchange programs and educational efforts are essential for fostering mutual understanding and respect among the varied communities of ASEAN. The ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC) framework prioritises the significance of fostering connections between individuals and promoting cultural comprehension as fundamental elements for building a united and resilient community. The ASEAN Cultural Heritage Digital Archive and the ASEAN Youth Volunteer Program are designed to cultivate a collective sense of identity and unity (Yang, 2020).

Obstacles and possibilities

Although the presence of diverse ethnic and cultural groups in ASEAN creates considerable difficulties for regional integration, it also offers distinct advantages. By implementing inclusive governance, equitable economic policies, and vigorous social activities, the management of diversity can effectively turn these obstacles into strengths. Some experts have contended that ASEAN's ability to effectively handle diversity might potentially serve as a blueprint for other regions grappling with comparable difficulties (Budirahayu & Saud, 2020). However, accomplishing this goal necessitates addressing certain crucial deficiencies in the existing body of knowledge and application. There is a requirement for more extensive research on the execution and consequences of ASEAN's integration programs at the grassroots level. Furthermore, the research should prioritise the creation of pragmatic frameworks for inclusive governance that can be customized to suit the varied political and cultural circumstances of ASEAN member states. Ultimately, it is imperative to foster increased cooperation among regional authorities, civil society organizations (CSOs), and local communities in order to guarantee that integration endeavours are comprehensive and enduring (Verkuyten & Yogeeswaran, 2020).

The presence of diverse ethnic and cultural groups in Southeast Asia is a significant aspect that poses both obstacles and opportunities for the process of regional integration in ASEAN. The literature emphasizes the intricacies of effectively handling variety across political, economic, and social realms. Although ASEAN has made notable progress in advancing regional integration, there is still a considerable amount of work that needs to be done in order to fully exploit the potential of its varied cultural environment (Sulaimanet al., 2022). By identifying and rectifying the deficiencies in existing research and practice, ASEAN can formulate more efficient methods for handling diversity and cultivating a harmonious, robust regional community. By implementing inclusive governance, equitable economic policies, and strong social efforts, ASEAN can effectively manage the challenges posed by ethno-cultural diversity and successfully accomplish its integration objectives (Johansson, 2022).

Literature Gap

Although there has been extensive research on the regional integration of ASEAN, there remains a noticeable deficiency in addressing the complex influence of ethnocultural diversity. The current body of literature predominantly examines the economic and political aspects, neglecting the influence of cultural diversity on integration processes. Studies sometimes oversimplify ASEAN as a unified entity, disregarding the distinct cultural identities and socioeconomic dynamics of its individual member states. Moreover, there is a lack of in-depth analysis of the impact of cultural variety on the formulation of policies, social integration, and the development of regional identity. The relationship between national identities and regional cohesiveness has not been thoroughly studied, especially in terms of how cultural variety can both pose challenges and bring benefits to ASEAN's integration efforts. It is essential to address this gap in order to create a more thorough comprehension of the obstacles and possibilities that ethno-cultural diversity brings to ASEAN's regional integration.

Discussion

The presence of diverse ethnic and cultural groups is a complicated and comprehensive obstacle to the process of regional integration in ASEAN. The varied cultural landscapes of ASEAN member states, such as Malaysia's multicultural culture and Indonesia's numerous ethnic groups, underscore the significance of taking cultural issues into account when formulating regional policies and initiatives (Hong & Minbaeva, 2021). The presence of diverse elements, although it has the potential to be advantageous, presents considerable challenges in establishing a unified regional identity and ensuring successful integration. A key obstacle lies in striking a delicate balance between preserving individual cultural identities and cultivating a cohesive ASEAN culture. Member states frequently stress the preservation of national sovereignty and cultural identity, which can create conflicts with regional integration initiatives. The contradiction between national interests and collective regional aspirations is clearly seen in the diverse reactions to ASEAN's cultural initiatives (Chan, 2019).

Furthermore, the presence of a variety of ethnic and cultural groups has a significant impact on the level of social unity and cooperation within individual countries as well as throughout the entire region (Dash, 2023). Internal ethnic tensions and disputes can impede a country's capacity to actively participate in regional initiatives, resulting in differences in both involvement and dedication to ASEAN's integration aims. For example, certain member states may experience the marginalization of ethnic minority groups, which can result in social unrest that affects the stability of the nation and, consequently, the process of regional integration (Lino & Mohd Hashim, 2020).

The significance of language as a unifying or divisive element also deserves consideration. The linguistic diversity within ASEAN, with more than a thousand languages spoken throughout the area, presents substantial obstacles to effective communication. Although English is the designated language of communication within ASEAN, the differing degrees of expertise among member states might hinder efficient collaboration and mutual comprehension (Karim, 2024). Although facing these obstacles, the ethnocultural variety within ASEAN can also serve as a valuable asset. The region's abundant cultural heritage offers avenues for cultural interchange and reciprocal education, promoting stronger regional unity. Efforts that foster cultural comprehension and inclusiveness have the potential to strengthen social unity and facilitate the process of integration. ASEAN's initiatives for cultural exchange and festivals can function as venues to exhibit cultural variety and foster a collective regional identity (Lin, 2020).

Ultimately, the presence of diverse ethno-cultural groups poses notable obstacles to the process of regional integration in ASEAN. However, it also presents prospects for promoting a more comprehensive and unified area. To tackle the intricacies of cultural diversity, it is necessary to implement sophisticated policies that strike a delicate balance between national identities and regional unity (Pongsin Viseshiriet al., 2023). By fully embracing and valuing its diverse cultural heritage, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has the potential to transform this variety into a distinctive and powerful asset that supports its ongoing efforts towards integration.

Conclusion

Ethnocultural diversity continues to be a crucial and complex factor for the regional integration of ASEAN. The diverse cultural composition of the region presents both opportunities and challenges in establishing a coherent and cohesive ASEAN identity. The main difficulties involve achieving a harmonious equilibrium between the national cultural identities and the shared regional identity, effectively handling internal ethnic conflicts, and surmounting language limitations. These variables frequently result in discrepancies in involvement and dedication to ASEAN's integration goals, highlighting the intricacy of promoting togetherness in a community as diverse as this. Although faced with these difficulties, there are chances to utilize cultural variety as a basis for enhanced regional integration. Efforts aimed at fostering cultural awareness and inclusivity have the potential to strengthen social unity and facilitate the process of integration. ASEAN's cultural exchange programs and festivals demonstrate its commitment to display cultural variety and foster a collective regional identity. These programs can reduce the potential for division caused by ethno-cultural differences by promoting mutual tolerance and understanding. In order to progress, ASEAN should implement sophisticated and all-encompassing policies that acknowledge and appreciate its cultural variety. This strategy necessitates a careful equilibrium between safeguarding national identities and fostering regional unity. ASEAN may enhance its regional community by leveraging its cultural diversity as a distinctive asset, fostering more resilience and cohesion. Ultimately, despite the significant difficulties posed by ethno-cultural variety, it also creates advantageous prospects for the regional integration of ASEAN. By implementing inclusive policies and cultural activities, ASEAN may effectively utilize its many characteristics to enhance regional cohesion and successfully accomplish its integration objectives. It is of utmost importance for ASEAN to tackle these problems with careful consideration and anticipation in order to ensure its ongoing advancement and achievement.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to the institutional authority for completion of the work.

References

  1. Budirahayu, T., & Saud, M. (2020). Proposing an Integrated Multiculturalism Learning System: A Study from Indonesian Schools. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00521-1
  2. Chan, A. (2019). Superdiversity and critical multicultural pedagogies: Working with migrant families. Policy Futures in Education, 18(5), 147821031987377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210319873773
  3. Dash, S. (2023). Look-Act East Policy and the Northeast Region. SpringerLink, 275–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3529-9_8
  4. Hammond, C. D. (2020). Regional cooperation in Northeast Asia: an analysis of policy ideas across institutions and disciplines in Japanese higher education. Ora.ox.ac.uk. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:0fb04803-666d-4288-bd3e-5fa51bc002cb
  5. Harjatanaya, T. Y., & Hoon, C.-Y. (2018). Politics of multicultural education in post-Suharto Indonesia: a study of the Chinese minority. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(1), 18–35.https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1493573
  6. Ho, E. L.-E. (2020). Leveraging Connectivities: Comparative Diaspora Strategies and Evolving Cultural Pluralities in China and Singapore. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(10), 1415–1429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220947754
  7. Hong, H.-J., & Minbaeva, D. (2021). Multiculturals as strategic human capital resources in multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00463-w
  8. Johansson, T. R. (2022). In defence of multiculturalism – theoretical challenges. International Review of Sociology, 34(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2022.2045141
  9. Juma, T. O. (2020). Application of Regional Security Complex Theory in Electoral Management, a View of East African Region. Trends in Technical & Scientific Research, 04(2). https://doi.org/10.19080/ttsr.2020.04.555635
  10. Karim, S. M. (2024). The organization of ethnocultural attachments among second- generation Germans. Social Science Research, 118, 102959–102959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102959
  11. Lin, C. (2020). Understanding Cultural Diversity and Diverse Identities. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, 929–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95870-5_37
  12. Lino, M., & Mohd Hashim, H. (2020). Cultural tolerance, positive relationships and well-being in Malaysian multicultural communities. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2020-1604-17
  13. Ludewig, A. (2021). Westlessness? Challenges for the EU’s Soft Power Approach. Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.30722/anzjes.vol13.iss1.15482
  14. Magnan, M.-O., Gosselin-Gagné, J., Audet, G., & Conus, X. (2024). Inclusive Education in the Context of Ethnocultural Diversity: Understanding the Process of Exclusion to Act in the School — A Secondary Publication. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(3), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v8i3.6448
  15. Moran, A. (2021). Globalisation, postnationalism and Australia. Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 128-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783320964542
  16. Munalim, L. O. (2019). Micro and Macro Practices of Multicultural Education in a Philippine University: Is It Global Integration Ready? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00497-7
  17. Nygymetova, G. (2020). Self-presentation in Eurasian integration: national roleconceptions and public rhetoric in Armenia, Belarus,Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, 2010 - 2017. University of Reading. https://doi.org/10.48683/1926.00096559
  18. Pongsin Viseshiri, Nuttaporn Lawthong, Fry, G. W., Ransom, L., Kim, S., & Nguyen, N. (2023). Thailand as a new international higher education hub: Major challenges and opportunities, a policy analysis. Research in Comparative and International Education, 18(2), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999231163401
  19. Ptak, T., & Konrad, V. (2021). “Crossing the River by Feeling the Stones”: How Borders, Energy Development and Ongoing Experimentation Shape the Dynamic Transformation of Yunnan Province. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 36(5), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2021.1924074
  20. Purwani, T., & Arvianti, I. (2020). Constructing Harmonization of Multicultural Society. Social Science Learning Education Journal, 5(06), 157–170. http://www.sslej.in/index.php/sslej/article/view/3418
  21. Rohmah, H., Rena, S., Pahrurraji, P., & Syarif, F. (2023). Implementation of Multicultural Education Values in Senior High School. At-Tadzkir: Islamic Education Journal, 2(2), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.59373/attadzkir.v2i2.29
  22. Sulaiman, S., Imran, A., Hidayat, B. A., Mashuri, S., Reslawati, R., & Fakhrurrazi, F. (2022). Moderation religion in the era society 5.0 and multicultural society. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, 180–193. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6ns5.2106
  23. Ullah, A. K. M. A., & Ming Yit Ho, H. (2020). Globalisation and Cultures in Southeast Asia: Demise, Fragmentation, Transformation. Global Society, 35(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1747992
  24. van Bakel, M., & Vance, C. M. (2023). Breaking out of the expatriate bubble in Denmark: insights from the challenge of making connections with local Danes. Journal of Global Mobility: The Home of Expatriate Management Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/jgm-06-2022-0022
  25. Verkuyten, M., & Yogeeswaran, K. (2020). Cultural diversity and its implications for intergroup relations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.010
  26. Yang, P. (2020). Differentiated inclusion, muted diversification: immigrant teachers’ settlement and professional experiences in Singapore as a case of “middling” migrants’ integration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(7), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2020.1769469

How to Cite

Das, S. (2024). Ethno-Cultural Diversity: A Challenging Parameter for Asean Regional Integration. Interdisciplinary International Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities (IIJASSAH), 1(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.62674/iijassah.2024.v1i1.004

Metrics

Article Contents

Indexed In

Indexed In





Tools



Keywords

Flagcounter

Flag Counter